3rd Circuit Court
of Appeal
Press Release
Rehearing Actions
- Both Civil & Criminal Cases
FROM 01/30/08 To 01/30/08
THE APPEALS
LISTED HEREIN ARE
NOW FINAL IN
THIS COURT AND
MAY
BE RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION.
***PLEASE NOTE: Not all
opinions are designated for
publication.***
Stephanie Armentor, Deputy Clerk
CARL MOSS
VERSUS
RONALD
GIFFORD
Trial Court:
Fourteenth Judicial District Court
Trial Court
Number: 2007-276
Trial Judge: Hon.
R. Richard Bryant Jr.
Opinion Rendered
on:
The Opinion -
Affirmed
The Opinion was
published
Opinion
Panel:
Hon.
Sylvia R. Cooks - -
Dissents
Hon. Marc
T. Amy - -
For
Hon.
Elizabeth A. Pickett -
- For
A rehearing
application was filed on:
HAND DELIVERED
TIMELY on
Participant
filing rehearing application:
Carl
Moss
Rehearing Action was published
The rehearing
action was: DENIED on
The rehearing
panel:
Hon.
Sylvia R. Cooks - -
Against
would grant.
Hon. Marc
T. Amy - -
For
Hon.
Elizabeth A. Pickett -
- For
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HENRY
SANDERS
VERSUS
STATE OF
Trial Court: LaSalle
Twenty-Eighth Judicial District Court
Trial Court
Number: 33,917
Trial Judge: Hon.
John Philip Mauffray, Jr.
Opinion Rendered
on:
The Opinion -
Reversed
The Opinion was
published
Opinion
Panel:
Hon. Michael G. Sullivan - - For
Hon. Glenn
B. Gremillion - - For
Hon. Billy
Howard Ezell - -
For
A rehearing
application was filed on:
POST MARK
TIMELY on
Participant
filing rehearing application:
Henry
Sanders
Rehearing Action was published
The rehearing
action was: DENIED on
The rehearing
panel:
Hon.
Michael G. Sullivan -
- For
Hon. Glenn
B. Gremillion - - For
Hon. Billy
Howard Ezell - -
For
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACLAFF, INC., ET AL.
VERSUS
ARCH INS. CO.,
ET AL.
Trial Court:
Fifteenth Judicial District Court
Trial Court
Number: 20031039
Trial Judge: Hon.
Marilyn Carr Castle
Opinion Rendered
on:
The Opinion -
Affirmed
The Opinion was
published
Opinion
Panel:
Hon.
Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux -
- For
Hon.
Jimmie C. Peters - -
For
Hon. James
T. Genovese - -
For
A rehearing
application was filed on:
POST MARK
TIMELY on
Participant
filing rehearing application:
MacLaff, Inc.
Rehearing Action was published
The rehearing
action was: DENIED on
The rehearing
panel:
Hon.
Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux -
- For
Hon.
Jimmie C. Peters - -
For
Hon. James
T. Genovese - -
For
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TARA RICO, ET
AL
VERSUS
KEVIN WARREN,
ET AL
Trial Court: Avoyelles
Twelfth Judicial District Court
Trial Court
Number: C-2006-9168
Trial Judge: Hon.
William Bennett
Writ Granted and
Made Peremptory on:
The Writ ruling
was not published
Writ Panel:
Hon.
Sylvia R. Cooks - -
For
Hon.
Michael G. Sullivan -
- For
Hon. Glenn
B. Gremillion - - For
Hon. Elizabeth A. Pickett - - Against
dissents
Hon. Billy Howard Ezell - - Against
dissents
A rehearing
application was filed on:
POST MARK
TIMELY on
Participant
filing rehearing application:
Tara
Rico
Rehearing Action was not published
The rehearing
action was: GRANTED on
The rehearing
panel:
Hon.
Sylvia R. Cooks - -
For
Hon.
Michael G. Sullivan -
- Against
dissents
Hon. Glenn
B. Gremillion - - For
Hon.
Elizabeth A. Pickett -
- For
Hon. Billy
Howard Ezell - -
For
Remarks: Writ Denied.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF
VERSUS
MURIEL LYLES,
JR.
Trial Court: ST. LANDRY
Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court
Trial Court
Number: 07K0094B
Trial Judge: Hon.
Ellis J. Daigle
Writ Not
Considered on:
The Writ ruling
was not published
Writ Panel:
Hon.
Sylvia R. Cooks - -
For
Hon. Glenn
B. Gremillion - - For
Hon. Elizabeth A. Pickett - - For
A rehearing
application was filed on:
HAND DELIVERED
TIMELY on
Participant
filing rehearing application:
Muriel Lyles,
Jr.
Rehearing Action was not published
The rehearing
action was: GRANTED on
The rehearing
panel:
Hon.
Sylvia R. Cooks - -
For
Hon. Glenn
B. Gremillion - - For
Hon.
Elizabeth A. Pickett -
- For
Remarks: After consideration of Defendant's
motion for
reconsideration,
this court's
hereby
rescinded. Following consideration of
the merits of
the writ
application, a new ruling will be issued.